[START-521] “Which do you prefer, me with perfect makeup or that girl?” Cosmetics clerk makes her boyfriend, bored waiting 20 minutes for his girlfriend’s makeup, cum on her face with blowjob and sex – Honjo Suzu

And still more name-stealing spoof impersonating? / cutting and pasting?

A caution to you troll. The site deleted the source, and the site your name steal trolling that provoked it – the troll name-stealing comment in

/?s=MDBK-407

Meaning the name-stealing I was replying to when I typed the above on 2 23 2026. I decided to assume you saw what I wrote, with its typos and all, while it was there. But it’s gone now. Gone with the name-steal you typed that I was replying to.

Yes, you’ve clearly applied yourself to finding ways around the site’s working filter.

And seems like you’ve clearly dedicated yourself to finding comments by others, then cutting and pasting those comments to places those others didn’t put them,

Typos and all.

Admin. I saw that the site deleted one of the troll’s name stealing comments from 2 23 2026 in MDBK-407

/942632/mdbk-407-delinquent-schoolgirl-with-a-perfect-body-tempts-with-soft-face-tit-smothering-and-ass-facesitting-draining-you-repeatedly-while-suffocating/#comment-646325

Thanks.

If there’s any interest by the site in addressing the name-stealing problem further, I’d hope another site filter, or more than one more, can be set up to “catch” whatever user name the troll is using to get around the “Mike” filter.

I think the troll uses a Greek Mu instead of an M.

Or the troll uses things that show up looking like picture frames between the letters (回 M 回 i 回 ke for example) if one pasted the hyperlink for the name into a word document.

There were no troll posts at all posted on February 19th. That was very remarkable.

If for some reason, the site “moderated” on that day (as opposed to the troll had to do something away from its computer that day) – I’d say the way the comment section worked on February 19th was just fine, and I’d hope to see more of it.

I also second this. Only the utterly entitled or the sick (and Mike is both, apparently) insist in posting not one but more than five walls of text per movie, or copy pasting off-topic stuff like the “Komonato” (sic) text he’s now repeating everywhere . And have the gall to say the site loses a lot because they are not allowed to comment a dozen times on a single movie anymore.

(He could at least make an effort to spell her name correctly if he so cares about her, but he actually only does about leaving his imprint everywhere).

He’s indulging in nonstop spamming in a way that would be largely prevented if comments were limited in length to a few hundred characters tops. So I’m for it.